In this connection no pun intendedcomputer whiz Zuckerberg and his best friend Eduardo Saverin, also a principal co-founder of Facebook, become embroiled in enough fights, including a nasty legal battle, to establish that there is not a single soul dwelling in their two bodies. What do you think Aristotle would have to say about the meaning of—and path to—friendship that has come to popularize the new millennium? Is it dying away? If so, what are the implications for life as we know it on this planet?
On a linked page we examine some of the implications for educators. In one setting we may describe someone as a friend, in another the label may seem less appropriate.
We may have a very thin understanding of what friendship entails. For example, Bellah et.
In contemporary western societies, it is suggested, we tend to define friendship in terms of the first component, and find the notion of utility a difficult to place within friendship.
What we least understand is the third component, shared commitment to the good, which seems to us quite extraneous to the idea of friendship.
In a culture dominated by expressive and utilitarian individualism, it is easy for us to understand the components of pleasure and usefulness, but we have difficulty seeing the point of considering friendship in terms of common moral commitments.
Many contemporary writers in the west tend to present friendship as private, voluntary, and happening between autonomous individuals. This contrasts in key respects with the classical view, and, as we will see, derives from a particular view of selfhood.
Furthermore, as Graham Allan has argued, relationships that are often presented as voluntary, informal and personal, still operate within the constraints of class, gender, age, ethnicity and geography — and this places a considerable question against the idea that friendship is a matter of choice.
Two classical views of friendship Aristotle provides us with one of the great discussions of friendship. He distinguishes between what he believes to be genuine friendships and two other forms: These two forms only last for as long as there is utility and pleasure involved, whereas genuine friendship does not dissolve.
It takes place between good men: This also entails appropriate self-concern. Aristotle on friendship Friendship… is a kind of virtue, or implies virtue, and it is also most necessary for living. Nobody would choose to live without friends even if he had all the other good things…. There are, however, not a few divergent views about friendship.
Some hold that it is a matter of similarity: There are three kinds of friendship…. Friendship based on utility. Utility is an impermanent things: So with the disappearance of the ground for friendship, the friendship also breaks up, because that was what kept it alive.
Friendships of this kind seem to occur most frequently between the elderly because at their age what they want is not pleasure but utility and those in middle or early life who are pursuing their own advantage. Such persons do not spend much time together, because sometimes they do not even like one another, and therefore feel no need of such an association unless they are mutually useful.
Friendships with foreigners are generally included in this class. Friendship based on pleasure. Friendship between the young is thought to be grounded on pleasure, because the lives of the young are regulated by their feelings, and their chief interest is in their own pleasure and the opportunity of the moment.
With advancing years, however, their tastes change too, so that they are quick to make and to break friendships; because their affection changes just as the things that please them do and this sort of pleasure changes rapidly.
Also the young are apt to fall in love, for erotic friendship is for the most part swayed by the feelings and based on pleasure. That is why they fall in and out of friendship quickly, changing their attitude often within the same day.
But the young do like to spend the day and live together, because that is how they realize the object of their friendship. Perfect friendship is based on goodness. Only the friendship of those who are good, and similar in their goodness, is perfect. For these people each alike wish good for the other qua good, and they are good in themselves.
Accordingly the friendship of such men lasts so long as they remain good; and goodness is an enduring quality. Also each party is good both absolutely and for his friend, since the good are both good absolutely and useful to each other. Similarly they please one another too; for the good are pleasing both absolutely and to each other; because everyone is pleased with his own conduct and conduct that resembles it, and the conduct of good men is the same or similar.
Friendship of this kind is permanent, reasonably enough; because in it are united all the attributes that friends ought to possess. For all friendship has as its object something good or pleasant — either absolutely or relatively to the person who feels the affection — and is based on some similarity between the parties.
But in this friendship all the qualities that we have mentioned belong to the friends themselves; because in it there is similarity, etc. Therefore it is between good men that both love and friendship are chiefly found and in the highest form.Social scientists focus on the role of learning, socialization, and culture, emphasizing the role of nurture.
Nature/Nurture Debate Nature - Human development is innate, biological, physiological; due largely to hereditary and is largely fixed.
The concept of friendship is historical; philosophers in different cultures and epochs have emphasized certain aspects of friendship that others have not. In ancient Greece and Rome, the civic dimension of friendship was prominent as some argued that it was part of the social glue that held societies together.
Jul 04, · Thus, the purpose of our study was to discover the role of friendship in heterosexual romantic relationships with a focus on the basic research tenets of heterosexual romantic friendships including trustworthiness, honesty, acceptance, and.
Lastly, we hold our friendship very highly and will do what it takes to continue to become closer. Another basic friendship need, or reason why people develop friendships, is affirmation.
In my opinion, this is the most important factor in a friendship.3/5(2). Social Essay help chat Workers. fraud. beauty. and An analysis of robert brownings monologue the haunting aristocrat needs a description of where earths life originated from Motivation is also an analysis of the concept of friendship and the roles of friends in social routine Are short term missions more helpful or hurtful one's Help with handwriting .
A Social Story is a non-coercive approach that presents social concepts and rules to children in the form of a brief story. This strategy could be used to teach a number of social and behavioral concepts, such as making transitions, playing a game, and going on .